問題 · 2026-06-01
按照以下文章,兒童被驅逐離境有什麼可能的原因? Skip to main contentSkip to navigation Thank you Your support powers our independent journalism Print subscriptions Search jobs My account UK The Guardian - Back to homeThe Guardian News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle Show more UK UK politics Education Media Society Law Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Rasika Samarasinghe taking a selfie with his wife and three children, in front of rolling hills View image in fullscreen Rasika Samarasinghe, a care worker who arrived in 2022, with his wife and children – who have now been told they must leave. Photograph: Courtesy of Samarasinghe family Immigration and asylum Home Office sends letters to children as young as five saying they must leave UK Children of those on care worker visas, who came legally before rule change, told to leave even if parents can stay Diane Taylor Mon 1 Jun 2026 11.03 BST Share Prefer the Guardian on Google Children as young as five who are living legally in the UK are being told by the Home Office they must leave the country even if their parents have been given permission to remain. The Guardian has seen five letters sent to children by the Home Office telling them they must leave the UK. A sixth letter has been sent to a woman who is six months pregnant and lives in the UK with her husband, telling her she must leave him and return to her country. The children have parents on care worker visas, which until March 2024 had allowed them to bring partners or children with them to the UK. “We are completely shocked by the family receiving these letters,” said Varuni Arachchige, a care worker based in Perth, Scotland with her husband, who works in a factory. Their two children, aged eight and five, are thriving at school and settled in their community. Arachchige has a degree in chemistry and a postgraduate qualification in analytical chemistry from the family’s home country, Sri Lanka, and an MSc from the University of Dundee in sustainability and water security. Her husband is a graduate in physical science and double maths. He and their children are dependants on her care worker visa. The family paid the Home Office thousands of pounds for their visa applications, pay taxes and do not claim any benefits. The government began to clamp down on family visas for care workers after the Home Office estimated in 2023 that about 120,000 family members were in the UK, joining 100,000 care worker applicants. From March 2024, care workers have no longer been allowed to bring their partners or children with them to the UK, and a ban on overseas recruitment of care workers was introduced from July 2025. However, the children who were sent letters in recent weeks arrived in the UK before the various bans and restrictions came into force. “We have been living legally in the UK since we arrived here on Christmas Day in 2022,” said Arachchige. “My visa has been extended by the Home Office until 2031. But my husband and children who are my dependants have been told to leave the country.” Lawyers said they had seen a rise in these sorts of cases in the past few weeks. Two recent surveys of migrant care workers revealed that new proposals to extend the period before they can settle in the UK – from five years to a baseline of 15 years – could lead to a mass exodus of this group of workers. Tulia Group CIC, which provides support and legal advice to migrants, surveyed 269 migrant care workers, who all said the settlement route should remain five years. Only 36% said they would remain here with longer settlement rules. In a separate survey of 1,162 migrant care workers by the health and social care platform Lifted, 69% said they would consider leaving the UK if the 15-year rule comes into force. The current workforce of sponsored migrant carers provides 4.2m hours of care a week for up to 280,000 people, much of which could be lost if the new rules prompt an exodus. Rasika Samarasinghe, a care worker who arrived in the UK in October 2022 and obtained a master’s at Northumbria University in business management, has received a Home Office refusal to allow his dependants on his visa – his wife, who works as a teaching assistant and their three young children aged 12, nine and eight – to stay in the UK. Samarasinghe with his wife and three children, sitting in a row on a wooden bench outdoors View image in fullscreen Samarasinghe with his wife and children. Photograph: Courtesy of Samarasinghe family “I don’t know what to do,” he said. “We have done everything legally in this country and we have paid every single tax the Home Office has asked us to pay. I’m not an overstayer, I just want a better future for my children. My focus is on family. I can’t do anything without my family. Both my wife and I work very hard here. We are so confused by what has happened to us. We haven’t told the children yet. My children are all settled and doing well at school. The youngest only speaks and writes English.” Naga Kandiah of MTC Solicitors said: “Migrant care workers in the UK are being placed in an impossible position: [to not] continue essential work or risk being separated from their children or partners. The result is an unfair choice between vital jobs in the social care system and long periods of separation from family. These workers care for vulnerable people, yet the rules can prevent them from caring for their own families.” Fizza Qureshi, the chief executive of Migrants’ Rights Network, condemned the “go home” instruction to children. “Migrant care workers continually bear the brunt of this government’s disdain for migrants. Nobody should be forced into a decision to either leave their livelihood or be separated from their families. The government really needs to grow a heart and treat migrant workers who are the foundations of our health and care systems, with more respect.” A Home Office spokesperson said: “We will always welcome those who contribute to this country and wish to build a better life here. But we must restore order and control to our borders. “We have set out plans for the biggest legal migration reforms in a generation, addressing the challenges caused by unprecedented levels of migration under the previous government. It is a privilege, not a right, to settle in the UK and it must be earned, rewarding contribution and those who play by the rules.” Explore more on these topics Immigration and asylum Care workers Home Office Social care Children news Share Reuse this content Most viewed Mandelson described Starmer’s No 10 operation as ‘beleaguered and bereft’ in published files – as it happened What is new in the latest release of Peter Mandelson documents? ‘What if I come out with nothing on?’ Marilyn Monroe and the defiance of her final photoshoot Six people stabbed in London after Arsenal’s victory parade Home Office sends letters to children as young as five saying they must leave UK Most viewed UKUK politicsEducationMediaSocietyLawScotlandWalesNorthern Ireland News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning Sign up for our email About us Help Complaints & corrections Contact us Tip us off SecureDrop Privacy policy Cookie policy Modern Slavery Act Tax strategy Terms & conditions All topics All writers Newsletters Digital newspaper archive Bluesky Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Threads TikTok YouTube Advertise with us Guardian Labs Search jobs Patrons Work with us Accessibility settings Back to top © 2026 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (dcr)
兒童被驅逐主要因英國政府2024年3月起禁止護理人員攜帶家屬,儘管受影響家庭在新規前已合法居留。
根據文章,兒童被驅逐離境的根本原因是英國政府自2024年3月起大幅改變護理人員簽證政策,禁止護理工作者攜帶配偶或子女入境,並自2025年7月起禁止海外招聘護理員。內政部向年僅五歲的兒童發出離境通知,儘管他們的父母獲准留英。
這些受影響家庭的關鍵困境在於,他們在新規生效前已合法抵達英國,繳納稅款且未領取福利,卻仍遭遣返威脅。政府將此政策變動視為「恢復邊境秩序與控制」的必要措施,聲稱在英國定居是「特權而非權利」,必須透過貢獻與遵守規則來贏得。此外,政府擬議將取得定居權的期限從五年延長至十五年,進一步加劇了移民家庭面臨被拆散或被迫離境的困境。
Multi-AI Truth Synthesis Engine
How you'd like to be notified when a job is ready.
Your account is shared across Consensable and Consensise. Deleting it permanently removes your data on both products. This cannot be undone.
If you change your mind, and your account will remain intact.
Pay for what you use. No hidden fees.
Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.
| Feature | Free | Plus | Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usage | |||
| Monthly credits | 300 | 3,000 | 13,200 |
| Privacy | |||
| Private questions | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citations in articles | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Answer length | |||
| Short | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Medium | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Long | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom length (write mode) | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Models | |||
| Presets available | Fast | Fast, Balanced & Thinking | Fast, Balanced & Thinking |
| Custom model set | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Developer | |||
| API access | — | — | ✓ |
| Webhook support | — | — | ✓ |
Credits are how Consensable measures AI usage. Each query consumes credits based on the models used, discussion rounds, and whether web search is enabled.
1 credit = $0.001 AI cost. Credits map directly to real AI model usage costs.
Free credits expire after 1 month. Paid credits last 1 year (monthly plans + top-ups), or 3 years on annual plans. Buy more or upgrade at any time.
You'll always see exactly how many credits a query used and how many you have remaining.
Need more mid-month? Buy credit packs any time. Packs: 3,000 for $5.99 · 13,200 for $23.99.
Submit as many queries as you like. Each tier unlocks larger AI panels and longer outputs. Save ~17% with annual billing.
Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.
| Feature | Starter | Essential | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usage | |||
| Queries | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| AI Panels | |||
| 3-AI panel | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 4-AI panel | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| 5-AI panel | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom panel (pick models) | — | — | ✓ |
| Answer length | |||
| Short | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Medium | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Long | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom | — | — | ✓ |
| Privacy | |||
| Public results | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Private results | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Queue priority | |||
| Queue | Standard | Priority | Super |