Fact-check · 2026-05-24

Fact-check: /factcheck The Economist ● Insider For you Menu The…

/factcheck The Economist ● Insider For you Menu The Economist Skip to content ● Insider For you Menu Weekly edition World in brief United States China Business Finance & economics Europe Asia Middle East Americas Artificial intelligence Culture Cartoons & games Science & technology | Charging ahead Breakthroughs for batteries could soon make them much better Solid-state cells would be faster and safer than today’s lithium-ion equivalents Save Share Illustration of three glowing cylindrical batteries against a black background, each releasing blue electrical discharges from the top terminals. The center battery features a circular cutaway revealing a colorful microscopic pattern inside Illustration: Mark Pernice May 20th 2026 | 6 min read Listen to this story LIKE ANY champion who spends too long at the top, the lithium-ion battery is stagnating. Over decades as the battery of choice in everything from smartphones to electric cars and drones, its design has been tweaked countless times to improve its energy density and performance. But, some scientists say, those improvements are approaching their theoretical limits. Even the best models are prone to dying out in the cold, rapidly losing capacity or—as is the case for those in household devices—spontaneously catching fire. At the same time, demand for batteries has never been greater. 30% of cars sold in 2026 are expected to be electric vehicles (EVs) which rely on them for power. Last year American homes and businesses installed a record number of big batteries. According to Wood Mackenzie, a consultancy, by the end of the decade installations could rise by almost 40%. Worthy challengers are desperately needed. Advances in materials science are at last bringing some within reach. Battery-builders are modifying existing materials and creating novel combinations to design batteries that store more energy while being safer and more stable than anything on the market today. The lithium-ion battery’s crown may be up for grabs. Solid-state batteries are among the most exciting alternatives. When a conventional lithium-ion battery is charged, lithium ions migrate from the cathode to the anode; when it is discharged, they return. The medium the ions shuttle through is called the electrolyte, usually a flammable, organic solvent soaked into all of a battery’s components. In solid-state batteries, however, the anode, cathode and electrolyte are compressed together as slabs. This means more conductive materials can be packed into the same space, allowing for energy densities as high as 500 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg), compared with about 300Wh/kg for liquid electrolytes. They are also less likely to combust. Although solid-state batteries have been studied for decades, researchers have thus far been able to make only tiny versions for use in such devices as medical implants. The most significant barrier to scaling them up is brittleness. When cells are charged and discharged, the ions repeatedly embed themselves in the electrode material. That causes the battery to expand and contract, creating voids between the components that can lead to cracking and deformation. This slows down the ions and degrades the battery’s performance. In January researchers at the Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, took a big step towards overcoming the brittleness problem. They created a high-performing electrolyte material by alternately stacking layers of ceramic 1-100nm thick with similarly thin sheets of polymer. The stack was then placed perpendicularly to the surface of the electrodes, like a layer cake sitting on its side. On its own, the ceramic is a good conductor but prone to cracking. The polymer, for its part, is flexible but a poor conductor. The combination allowed ions to flow as smoothly as the best existing solid-state electrolytes, but with a much lower tendency to crack. There are other hurdles to overcome. As batteries charge and discharge, wiry crystals known as dendrites can grow on the electrodes’ surface, leading to cracking and, eventually, short circuits. Scientists have long believed that these form when excess lithium ions from the cathode accumulate on the surface of the anode (rather than being absorbed). Stronger electrode materials, which would resist the cracking, are an obvious solution. In a paper published in March, however, a team led by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology concluded this understanding was flawed. Instead, they said, dendrites grow when chemical reactions change the electrode’s properties, causing them to weaken. That suggests scientists should be looking for electrodes with greater chemical stability, not just strength. Materials science can also make solid-state batteries faster. In conventional polymer electrolytes, ions can move only as fast as the surrounding polymer segments allow. A group at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, part of America’s Department of Energy, found a way of decoupling the two sets of movements. They achieved this by adding chemical compounds called zwitterions to polymer segments that would ordinarily be poor conductors. Although zwitterions are neutral molecules, they have charged regions that can give ions a boost. The team’s results showed that this configuration could make ions travel through the electrolyte as much as 10bn times faster. Future tests will show how it performs in a cell. Braving the elements One noteworthy advantage of solid-state electrolytes is that they would open the door to materials other than lithium. Sodium-ion batteries, which replace the lithium in the cathode with sodium, are especially attractive. Sodium is not only cheaper and stabler than lithium, it is 1,000 times more abundant in Earth’s crust. Unfortunately sodium atoms are bigger and heavier than those of lithium, meaning they are unlikely to embed in conventional graphite electrodes. At present, the result is a heavier battery that can store less energy. Although better electrodes can improve matters—for example hard carbon, which is capable of absorbing sodium ions into its spongelike structure, outperforms graphite—no suitable liquid electrolytes have yet been found. A solid electrolyte would be easier to work with. For one, the decreased risk of dendrite formation in solid-state batteries would allow anodes to be made out of highly reactive sodium metal. That would allow them to store more energy per kilogram than would be possible at present. Whereas a battery with a hard carbon anode has an energy density of around 175Wh/kg, sodium metal anodes could enable densities closer to 500Wh/kg. To boost a solid-state sodium-ion battery’s capacity yet further, researchers are experimenting with removing the anode altogether. That would create space for a thicker cathode that can be packed with more sodium, in turn boosting how much energy a battery could store. Removing the anode need not be fatal to the battery’s operation. While it charges, the sodium ions would move from the cathode to another battery component known as the current collector, where they would accumulate until discharge occurs. In effect, an anode is created as the battery operates. The heady pace of progress is the product of a truly global competition to produce the best solid-state design, says Shirley Meng, a materials scientist at the University of Chicago. The contest could also revolutionise the way batteries are manufactured. For now batteries with liquid electrolytes are built by submerging electrodes in vats of solvents and using enormous amounts of energy to dry them off. Solid-state batteries made in this way develop micropores on their surfaces, increasing the odds of malfunction. Thicker electrodes are also trickier to make because they dry unevenly. So-called dry electrode manufacturing—in which dry powders are pressed together to form solid batteries—is, therefore, being taken increasingly seriously. Trials have shown that it cuts energy use by about half and manufacturing costs by about a fifth, while boosting the overall performance of the batteries. Many companies, including Tesla, a maker of batteries and EVs, and LG Energy Solution, a South Korean battery maker, are competing to be first to perfect it. Distinguishing hype from reality is not easy. But recent developments mean that ambitious promises could be fulfilled. China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology, the world’s largest battery manufacturer, has said it will produce solid-state batteries by 2027 and plans to launch the first sodium-ion EV by the middle of this year. Samsung, a South Korean electronics company, has said it will mass produce solid-state batteries by 2027 while Toyota, a Japanese carmaker, has made a similar pledge. Ford Motors, an American car manufacturer, launched a battery-making unit this month, and plans to deliver large-scale batteries for data centres and industrial businesses by next year. In the battery-making business, these are electrifying times. ■ Curious about the world? To enjoy our mind-expanding science coverage, sign up to Simply Science, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter. Explore more Science & technology Follow Technology Follow → See the latest from topics you follow This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline “Charging ahead” From the May 23rd 2026 edition Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents ⇒ Explore the edition Save Share Reuse this content simply-science Subscriber only | Simply Science Curious about the world? Enjoy a weekly fix of our mind-expanding science coverage Delivered to you every week Sign up More from Science & technology A glass cup containing a graphic lighting bolt Well Informed You probably don’t need extra electrolytes Unless you’re athletic or unwell An enlarged image of radiation-blocking particles in a lab at Stardust Solutions Could microscopic spheres of silica help cool the planet? Private money is bringing new ideas—and new concerns—to solar-geoengineering research An aerial view of people in protective clothing on board the cruise ship MV Hondius. The hantavirus outbreak is a tragedy—and a valuable data source The risk to public health remains low Japanese eels have two types of sperm Understanding why could help boost their numbers Well Informed How well do anabolic steroids work? Very. But beware the side-effects AI models are being used to predict conflict Good data are hard to come by Get The Economist app on iOS or Android The Economist About Reuse our content Subscribe Gift subscriptions The Economist Pro SecureDrop The Economist Group The Economist Group Economist Enterprise Economist Enterprise Events Economist Education Courses Contact Help and support Advertise Press centre Affiliate programme Careers Working here Executive Jobs To enhance your experience and ensure our website runs smoothly, we use cookies and similar technologies. Manage cookies Terms of use Privacy Cookie Policy Accessibility Modern Slavery Statement Sitemap Your Privacy Choices Registered in England and Wales. No. 236383 | Registered office: The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London, WC2N 6HT | VAT Reg No: GB 340 436 876 © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2026

The article is largely accurate on battery science and near-term industry trends, but presents some technical targets as closer to reality than they are, and the article's date (May 2026) creates ambiguity about which claims are forecasts versus reported facts.

Where the panel agreed

Where the panel disagreed

Key Claims

More like this

See more public answers →

By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
Assessment
Details

Answer

Key Claims

Permanent Action

Delete Your Account

Your account is shared across Consensable and Consensise. Deleting it permanently removes your data on both products. This cannot be undone.

If you change your mind, and your account will remain intact.

History

Explore

Examples

Tap any example to try it.

Simple, transparent pricing

Pay for what you use. No hidden fees.

Free
$0
300
credits / month
  • Fast preset
  • Free credits valid 1 month
  • Public questions
Most Popular
Plus
$5.99/mo
3,000
credits / month
Everything in Free, and:
  • All presets — Fast, Balanced, Thinking, Custom
  • All lengths — Short, Medium, Long, Custom
  • Private questions
  • Citations in articles
Pro
$23.99/mo
13,200
credits / month
Everything in Plus, and:
  • API access
  • Webhooks

Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.

Full feature comparison

FeatureFreePlusPro
Usage
Monthly credits3003,00013,200
Privacy
Private questions
Citations in articles
Answer length
Short
Medium
Long
Custom length (write mode)
AI Models
Presets availableFastFast, Balanced & ThinkingFast, Balanced & Thinking
Custom model set
Developer
API access
Webhook support

How credits work

Credits are how Consensable measures AI usage. Each query consumes credits based on the models used, discussion rounds, and whether web search is enabled.

Transparent pricing

1 credit = $0.001 AI cost. Credits map directly to real AI model usage costs.

Long validity

Free credits expire after 1 month. Paid credits last 1 year (monthly plans + top-ups), or 3 years on annual plans. Buy more or upgrade at any time.

Full visibility

You'll always see exactly how many credits a query used and how many you have remaining.

Top-up packs available

Need more mid-month? Buy credit packs any time. Packs: 3,000 for $5.99 · 13,200 for $23.99.

Multi-AI consensus, unlimited.

Submit as many queries as you like. Each tier unlocks larger AI panels and longer outputs. Save ~17% with annual billing.

Starter
$0
  • 3-AI panel
  • Short answers
  • Public results
Essential
$4.99/mo
Everything in Starter, and:
  • Priority queue
  • 3 or 4-AI panels
  • Short or Medium answers
  • Private results
Most Popular
Premium
$9.99/mo
Everything in Essential, and:
  • Super priority
  • Up to 5-AI panel
  • Custom AI panel (pick your own models)
  • Short, Medium, Long or Custom answers

Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.

Full feature comparison

FeatureStarterEssentialPremium
Usage
QueriesUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
AI Panels
3-AI panel
4-AI panel
5-AI panel
Custom panel (pick models)
Answer length
Short
Medium
Long
Custom
Privacy
Public results
Private results
Queue priority
QueueStandardPrioritySuper
Your task has been submitted. You will be notified as soon as it's processed.
Loading...
In Consensise, jobs are queued and open-source AI models that do not browse the web are used. For near real-time responses, commercial AI models, or current-affairs queries, consider the credit-based Consensable.

My Jobs

Loading...