GET
Grade · 2026-05-21
/rank the information relability of cantonese speaking youtubers who are based in the UK, 胡思，鬆仔，王俊彥，吳志森，趙博，曹總，羅家聰，馮智政
4 / 10
The panel disagreed sharply on how to weight presentation quality against substantive content. Gemini graded the actual subject matter (credibility of these YouTubers), awarding 6/10 for identifying a meaningful topic with mixed-reliability sources, despite their ideological bias. Sonar graded the submission itself, penalizing vague framing, lack of criteria, and presentation issues, awarding 2/10. The final score of 4 reflects that while the core topic is identifiable and has some merit, the submission suffers from insufficient structure, unclear intent, and missing context that would allow proper evaluation. A stronger response would specify what 'information reliability' means, provide evaluation criteria, and clarify the purpose of the inquiry.
The panel disagreed sharply on how to weight presentation quality against substantive content. Gemini graded the actual subject matter (credibility of these YouTubers), awarding 6/10 for identifying a meaningful topic with mixed-reliability sources, despite their ideological bias. Sonar graded the submission itself, penalizing vague framing, lack of criteria, and presentation issues, awarding 2/10. The final score of 4 reflects that while the core topic is identifiable and has some merit, the submission suffers from insufficient structure, unclear intent, and missing context that would allow proper evaluation. A stronger response would specify what 'information reliability' means, provide evaluation criteria, and clarify the purpose of the inquiry.
The listed YouTubers represent a mix of professional journalists, former politicians, and financial analysts, which generally provides a higher baseline of reliability compared to anonymous influencers. However, their content is heavily characterized by subjective political commentary and an 'exile' perspective, which can introduce significant confirmation bias. While they are credible in terms of their backgrounds, viewers must distinguish between their factual reporting and their personal ideological agendas.
The content is too vague and appears to contain spelling errors and unclear wording, making the intended request hard to evaluate precisely. It lists several Cantonese-speaking figures and asks about their “information reliability,” but provides no criteria, context, or supporting evidence to judge credibility. The strongest part is that the topic is identifiable, but the lack of specificity and organization makes it a weak submission.
Multi-AI Truth Synthesis Engine
How you'd like to be notified when a job is ready.
Your account is shared across Consensable and Consensise. Deleting it permanently removes your data on both products. This cannot be undone.
If you change your mind, and your account will remain intact.
Pay for what you use. No hidden fees.
Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.
| Feature | Free | Plus | Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usage | |||
| Monthly credits | 300 | 3,000 | 13,200 |
| Privacy | |||
| Private questions | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citations in articles | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Answer length | |||
| Short | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Medium | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Long | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom length (write mode) | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Models | |||
| Presets available | Fast | Fast, Balanced & Thinking | Fast, Balanced & Thinking |
| Custom model set | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Developer | |||
| API access | — | — | ✓ |
| Webhook support | — | — | ✓ |
Credits are how Consensable measures AI usage. Each query consumes credits based on the models used, discussion rounds, and whether web search is enabled.
1 credit = $0.001 AI cost. Credits map directly to real AI model usage costs.
Free credits expire after 1 month. Paid credits last 1 year (monthly plans + top-ups), or 3 years on annual plans. Buy more or upgrade at any time.
You'll always see exactly how many credits a query used and how many you have remaining.
Need more mid-month? Buy credit packs any time. Packs: 3,000 for $5.99 · 13,200 for $23.99.
Submit as many queries as you like. Each tier unlocks larger AI panels and longer outputs. Save ~17% with annual billing.
Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.
| Feature | Starter | Essential | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usage | |||
| Queries | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| AI Panels | |||
| 3-AI panel | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 4-AI panel | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| 5-AI panel | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom panel (pick models) | — | — | ✓ |
| Answer length | |||
| Short | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Medium | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Long | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom | — | — | ✓ |
| Privacy | |||
| Public results | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Private results | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Queue priority | |||
| Queue | Standard | Priority | Super |