Public answers on Consensable

591 multi-AI syntheses readers have chosen to publish.

AskHas there been any recent neighborhood property price changes? AskWhat is the current asking price for 34 Bedale Road? AskEstimated selling price AskCheck how big is my house in 34 Bedale road Castleford Factcheck/factcheck Skip to main contentSkip to navigation Thank you Your support powers our independent journalism Print subscriptions Search jobs My account UK The Guardian - Back to homeThe Guardian News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle Show more Environment Climate crisis Wildlife Energy Pollution Traffic on A12 road with City of London skyscrapers in the background. View image in fullscreen London’s ultra low emissions zone was introduced in 2019 and expanded in 2023. Photograph: Marcin Rogozinski/Alamy Pollutionwatch Air pollution Emergency hospital admissions fell after introduction of London’s T-charge and Ulez, study suggests Imperial College scientists analysed health records before and after introduction of air pollution reduction zones Gary Fuller Fri 12 Jun 2026 06.00 BST Share Prefer the Guardian on Google Low emission and clean air zones attract controversy whenever they are proposed, but there is growing evidence that they work in improving air quality. The Bradford zone was followed by a reduction of about 25% in GP visits for heart and breathing problems and survey data shows that the central London zone was followed by a reduction in the likelihood of a person taking sick leave. Now analysis of health records has found emergency admissions to hospital reduced after the introduction of the T-charge and ultra-low emissions zone (Ulez) in central London. Both schemes were designed to reduce air pollution inhaled by Londoners. Starting in 2017, the T-charge was an additional congestion charge for older, more polluting vehicles. During T-charge, many of the vehicles that drove in central London were upgraded in preparation for the introduction of the more comprehensive central London Ulez in 2019. Dr Rosemary Chamberlain, who undertook the research at Imperial College London, said: “Given what we know about the link between air pollution and health, we wanted to understand if the introduction of the T-charge and Ulez also resulted in a reduction in people being admitted to hospital.” The researchers looked at emergency admissions to hospital, excluding cases such as accidents, burns, drug overdose, poisoning or self-harm. For people living in the central London zone, admissions increased at 3% per year before the schemes started. After their launch there was decrease of 3% per year in emergency admissions, including an 8% reduction for heart problems and a 6% reduction for breathing problems. A wood-burning stove Labour must fulfil promise to introduce clean air act, charities urge Read more The researchers then investigated whether the changes could have been due to other factors. Chamberlain said: “We needed to make sure that we could separate the effect of the schemes from other trends, such as changes in healthcare seeking behaviour, overall trends in hospital admissions and other policies that improved air pollution. We did this by looking at other areas in the country that are similar to the central Ulez area.” People protest against Ulez. View image in fullscreen Ulez has faced opposition since its introduction. Photograph: Martin Pope/Zuma Press Wire/Rex/Shutterstock The reduction in the total emergency admissions and the decrease for heart problems remained robust when compared with other areas. The downward change for breathing problems was still present in the data, but this did not reach statistical significance. Chamberlain said: “The inconclusive finding for respiratory outcomes may be partly because our analysis considered adults only. Children are particularly susceptible to the effects of air pollution on respiratory health, so an analysis of childhood respiratory outcomes may show a more conclusive result.” The central London Ulez was launched just one year before the Covid pandemic. Although nitrogen dioxide from traffic had been reduced by about 44% on roads in central London before lockdowns began, the researchers did not have sufficient health data to distinguish between the separate effects of Ulez and T-charge. Dr Daniela Fecht, who led the study, said: “We controlled for other factors and trends in our study design so we can conclude that reductions in hospital admissions are directly linked to the emission reduction initiatives in central London. “Other factors such as more walking and cycling or a reduction in traffic noise may also be contributing but we are fairly certain that these improvements in health are due to the reductions in air pollution. Our results provide clear evidence that clean air zones and low emission zones can bring public health benefits.” Explore more on these topics Air pollution Pollutionwatch London Low emission zones Health NHS news Share Reuse this content Most viewed Starmer admits he must ‘turn things around’ as US adds to pressure over defence spending Live Elon Musk becomes world’s first trillionaire after SpaceX shares jump on stock market debut – business live Live Middle East crisis live: final text of peace deal between US and Iran agreed, says Pakistan’s prime minister Jemma Stapleton, Australian sprinter and Stawell Gift finalist, dies aged 25 on family holiday Labour’s woes are like a slow-motion car crash – and Keir Starmer isn’t even in the driving seat Marina Hyde Most viewed EnvironmentClimate crisisWildlifeEnergyPollution News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning Sign up for our email About us Help Complaints & corrections Contact us Tip us off SecureDrop Privacy policy Cookie policy Modern Slavery Act Tax strategy Terms & conditions All topics All writers Newsletters Digital newspaper archive Bluesky Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Threads TikTok YouTube Advertise with us Guardian Labs Search jobs Patrons Work with us Accessibility settings Back to top © 2026 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (dcr) Ask世界盃冠軍的獎金和榮譽有哪些？ Ask世界盃整個流程直至取得冠軍，請參考FIFA說出如何由小組直至取得冠軍的流程 AskRe https://www.energylivenews.com/2026/06/11/sizewell-b-nuclear-plant-to-get-life-extension/ 英國其他核電廠也可以延長壽命嗎？ AskMissionary Cowgirl (partner on top, facing forward) Reverse Cowgirl Doggy Style Spooning Side-by-Side Standing Seated/Lap Position Lotus Scissors Butterfly can u please explain how this moves are done RankMissionary Cowgirl (partner on top, facing forward) Reverse Cowgirl Doggy Style Spooning Side-by-Side Standing Seated/Lap Position Lotus Scissors Butterfly Debate有指美股近年IPO上市首一年都錄得巨大回調，可能因素是其上市估值過高，上市後市場調整，也因為上市後90-180日解禁期後，內部售股引發拋售，但SPACEX股權集中，Elon Musk有85％持股，對上市一年內股價表現有何看法 DebateSPACEX聽日上市，有指估值過高，質疑其盈利能力，值不值得長期持有 AskWhat is the quickest way to travel between Glasgow and Edinburgh? AskHow far from glasgrow to edinburgh Askfor the UK Gov, the referees, the Lead Shift Manager in ASDA is it qualify as referees? Askhi Ask簡述 Monkey's Paw 的故事及其寓意 Ask現代手機在充滿電後會繞過電池直接供電以減少充電循環，且在一般運作下並不會過熱 Outcome: against Reasoning: 雖然For側正確指出現代手機具備過充保護與旁路供電機制，但其將這些技術的效果絕對化，聲稱「長期滿電完全安全」與「一般運作不會過熱」過於武斷。Against側更準確地反映了科學共識：優化充電機制確實能降低部分風險[1][2]，但長時間維持滿電、高溫環境與邊充邊用仍會加速鋰電池老化[1][3]，消費者委員會明確指出0°C以下或35°C以上會縮短壽命[3]。Against側的論點更符合實證證據與保守但科學的建議。 --- Following up: /ask 都話唔係叫你 辯論 囉叫你思考下 都講唔同埋都講咗個前題係唔係用高號電量程式落唔係一邊叉住一邊打機囉 係一般使用囉減低個charge cycle 最緊要 緊要喎 Debate現代手機在充滿電後會繞過電池直接供電以減少充電循環，且在一般運作下並不會過熱 Ask/ask 思考及分析現代手提電話喺維持在20至80%之間用比較好定還是係差全都去100%然後by pass個電池供電 比較 好

Home · About · Sitemap

By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy
Assessment
Details

Answer

Key Claims

Permanent Action

Delete Your Account

Your account is shared across Consensable and Consensise. Deleting it permanently removes your data on both products. This cannot be undone.

If you change your mind, and your account will remain intact.

History

⌕

Explore

⌕

Examples

Tap any example to try it.

Simple, transparent pricing

Pay for what you use. No hidden fees.

Free
$0
300
credits / month
  • ✓Fast preset
  • ✓Free credits valid 1 month
  • ✓Public questions
Most Popular
Plus
$5.99/mo
3,000
credits / month
Everything in Free, and:
  • ✓All presets — Fast, Balanced, Thinking, Custom
  • ✓All lengths — Short, Medium, Long, Custom
  • ✓Private questions
  • ✓Citations in articles
Pro
$23.99/mo
13,200
credits / month
Everything in Plus, and:
  • ✓API access
  • ✓Webhooks

Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.

Full feature comparison

FeatureFreePlusPro
Usage
Monthly credits3003,00013,200
Privacy
Private questions—✓✓
Citations in articles—✓✓
Answer length
Short✓✓✓
Medium—✓✓
Long—✓✓
Custom length (write mode)—✓✓
AI Models
Presets availableFastFast, Balanced & ThinkingFast, Balanced & Thinking
Custom model set—✓✓
Developer
API access——✓
Webhook support——✓

How credits work

Credits are how Consensable measures AI usage. Each query consumes credits based on the models used, discussion rounds, and whether web search is enabled.

Transparent pricing

1 credit = $0.001 AI cost. Credits map directly to real AI model usage costs.

Long validity

Free credits expire after 1 month. Paid credits last 1 year (monthly plans + top-ups), or 3 years on annual plans. Buy more or upgrade at any time.

Full visibility

You'll always see exactly how many credits a query used and how many you have remaining.

Top-up packs available

Need more mid-month? Buy credit packs any time. Packs: 3,000 for $5.99 · 13,200 for $23.99.

Multi-AI consensus, unlimited.

Submit as many queries as you like. Each tier unlocks larger AI panels and longer outputs. Save ~17% with annual billing.

Starter
$0
  • ✓3-AI panel
  • ✓Short answers
  • ✓Public results
Essential
$4.99/mo
Everything in Starter, and:
  • ✓Priority queue
  • ✓3 or 4-AI panels
  • ✓Short or Medium answers
  • ✓Private results
Most Popular
Premium
$9.99/mo
Everything in Essential, and:
  • ✓Super priority
  • ✓Up to 5-AI panel
  • ✓Custom AI panel (pick your own models)
  • ✓Short, Medium, Long or Custom answers

Prices in USD, excl. tax. Local currency and applicable taxes calculated at checkout.

Full feature comparison

FeatureStarterEssentialPremium
Usage
QueriesUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
AI Panels
3-AI panel✓✓✓
4-AI panel—✓✓
5-AI panel——✓
Custom panel (pick models)——✓
Answer length
Short✓✓✓
Medium—✓✓
Long——✓
Custom——✓
Privacy
Public results✓✓✓
Private results—✓✓
Queue priority
QueueStandardPrioritySuper
Your task has been submitted. You will be notified as soon as it's processed.
Loading...
In Consensise, jobs are queued and open-source AI models that do not browse the web are used. For near real-time responses, commercial AI models, or current-affairs queries, consider the credit-based Consensable.

My Jobs

Loading...